Showing posts with label participation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label participation. Show all posts

Toward Real Democracy

 When we don't use our governance methods we do not have them. We have declared republicanism and democracy as important ways of our governance. Let's begin to consider republicanism and democracy and how they can be used.


This is a quick and sketchy essay at beginning that consideration. So, this piece aims at beginning to clarify our meaning of republicanism and of democracy. Then to consider how they are used and how they are worked to our benefit.

        Participatory democracy is a phrase being used these days. I feel uncomfortable  saying that real democracy is participatory democracy because all democracy must be participatory. That is the word democracy itself means people themselves doing their governance. Once a greater percentage of americans were clear about that. Now in real life there is rarely either this or that, but more often a combination of a lot.

        Republicanism began much as a rejection of the present rule. The rule of the time was rule by monarchy and oligarchy. That was rule by king, nobility, and perhaps a growing merchant class. Than the question was about who should rule. Then as the word republican suggests, the answer was the people. That turned out to be a bit of a problem for those we have called our founding fathers. Perhaps there was a subconscious feeling around that it might be good to be ruled by our fathers. 

        This piece is directed to Americans and is about them doing more of their own governance. However, those of  you who are not U.S. citizens may find something of interest here, perhaps even something useful. Many of the forbearers of present Americans believed that they could take care of themselves together and by doing so could be the governors of themselves. Now numerous present day Americans are beginning to believe that they can revive that belief and forgotten knowledge. It is late for doing that, but I am sure that it is possible.

        When the United States was founded, mostly by Europeans, the concept of a republic had considerable popularity among them. Rule by a king and a hereditary nobility was no longer working well for them/The spread of reading and writing and the actual state of affairs had effected them. A significant portion of educated Europeans knew rather a lot about ancient Greek democratic governance and many thought it was a fine way for a populous to take care of itself.

        A great many of those who began to immigrate to what would become the United States and also to the rest of the Americas were not ready to be ruled to by kings and nobles. They had found that every king had behaved royally and not every noble behaved nobley.

        They got to the new land and found that kings were weak in sway and far away. Many felt that they could take care of themselves and often called that responsibility freedom. The question of how they would do that care taking and freedom, when raised, was seldom well answered. In the back of many minds the thought may have been that someone would take care of that. And they were not wrong. Someone always had, but that someone had not always been careful of everyone. A great many people had little knowledge of many of the factors of self rule and less practice. They had little idea of how to rule themselves together. They did know quite a bit about cooperation in a variety of situations and did have some notion that practice can perfect. 

        A few f them had begun to consider self governance in their present circumstances. They knew about cooperation, and somethings of the workings of the Roman Republic and democracy of ancient Greeks. They knew that few of immigrants had experience with government at state level.

        Naturally the idea of not being ruled by someone else led to the Idea of self rule. The concept of self rule led to some consideration of self-rule together. Thoughts of this sort began to circulate a bit among the general population on both sides of the Atlantic. These thoughts were current among those who would be called the founding fathers of the U.S. Why fathers? Why not patriots or men or just say founders. Is this a hint that many wanted to be taken care of? 

            The idea that rule by others was a problem was a very republican concept and many early Americans. Rule by us became a popular idea, but the nature of who "us" include was, was not always clear. Many said us was all of us, but few included the Chinese in that us at that time. How was this rule was to be done was not clear. It was to be popular rule and we just knew who was popular. I imagine that in early Greece early Greeks were popular. Among early colonial Spanish people it was to gente reason and not every every Spaniard and certainly not some ignorant Frenchman. French said ''us'' was to include every citizen. They knew that a born and bred Turk was not a likely French citizen. For the early greeks democratic rule was not easy, but who was to rule were Greek citizens and the nature of a Greek citizen was agreed on by nearly all Greeks.

        So, this governance deal was not easy to workout. You and I may come pretty close to agreeing who is an American citizen, but just how those should rule you and I or even with you and I could be a problem.

        Among our active ancestors, just before 1776 were some pretty thoughtful guys. Women were not yet consider as strong contenders for citizenship. Anyway some male contenders began to talk things over. Many of them held stronger than usual egalitarian ideas! And their idea of who could be a citizen and man who could speak, read, and write English and not a criminal was certainly a contender. They agreed that not every man who was a citizen was a good person to hold position of power in a new government. Still they thought it best that every citizen be able to participate. So they came to an idea which has been called representative democracy. It is probably not really close to the best idea, but it is still a good one.

            Every citizen could speak for laws, positions, and policies of government and vote for them. Positions in government were to be for limited time and the important and powerful positions were to be held by election by citizens. Good ideas for that time and place. But could every citizen come to any public office and the son or daughter come to any public office? It seems possible.
        
            So, a few men began to consider how to institute such governance in their time and place and the nature of potential citizens. They had the idea of  "representative democracy" in mind. They wanted the will of the people to be well represented. Their reasons for that are important and you can check them out elsewhere or we can review them here later if you so wish. Right now this piece has begun to feel too long for me to manage.

            Back to our theme. States were already being formed so there would be states in this new nation.There could be a senate with men to represent those states. Those men would be elected by the citizens of each state. The people would elect their representatives to express their will and the representatives would write up that will and enact it as the law of the land. A national president would be elected to administer those laws to see that they were followed as the peoples' representatives ordered.

            They began to create a written constitution of this organization of governance. That Constitution was put in effect and today it is still in effect with few modifications. It is still relatively short, but contains many important factors. Among those factors were those put in place to insure that to much power be accumulated in one sector. They wanted national power to be well shared so that the people were well represented and well served.

            Plans worked out pretty well.We had a written constitution which we could use to see how we were doing with our rules in our land. We began to teach our children about republican governance, democracy and our Constitution. Then after a time we began to quickly develop militarily and economically and were pleased, but not very vigilante. Then we began to move into a kind of imperialism which proved to be a poor partner for republicanism. Our population grew quickly, much of that growth was by immigration. 

            As a people we began to forget about our responsibility for taking care of one another politically and for working our Constitution. We began to teach our children, or have them taught, more about making money in certain ways and less about how to govern ourselves together. We mostly had ''good'' ideas for doing what we were doing, but we were losing control of our lives. Our doing did not help us work our republic or us our democracy.Then so of us got so nervous about our republic that we began to call it a democracy and that seemed to lead us to forget the nature of democracy and how to use democracy! I seems that we may be left with a dying Empire if we do not begin to practice appropriate governance. We know that governance has little to do with marching and demonstrating, and not much more with voting. For us it seems to be working the constitution of our republic in a democratic way together.

            We still have an idea that democracy is a good idea, as is republicanism. They are good ideas, but they are unless unless they are worked. They must be used to be useful. They must be used and they ought to be taught. There is much we can do now to take care of ourselves. We can make decisions about taking care of ourselves together. To do that it is best to be among those whom we trust and realize that there are groups worthy of trust. Communication is a key to doing that. Face to face talk is the most powerful communication for us. We can learn to better do that kind of communication. We can communicate with each other and dialogue among ourselves about what we have the will to do together. We can nurture that will in healthy ways.

        In our present government it is now easy to arrange to keep fairly good track of  our own representatives  collective and individual doings and also much of the doings of the rest of our government. We do need some organization as well as some modern technologies. We can learn and act together. There is too much for any one to do alone, but so what? There are enough of us to easily that which needs doing together. We are many. We can cooperate. We already know about co-operation and learn to practice more. Little by little we can learn to appropriately organize our doings. 

           We already have that which we need, take care of the business of taking care of ourselves. We can promptly know what our representatives are doing and to promptly give them instructions as what to do and not to do for us. With the modern technology at our disposal and our appropriate we can easily maintain close communication. Of course representatives will want to know that they are getting our support. They may also know that we are getting close to being able to represent ourselves. Also they know that they have a contract for only a couple of years at a time and may want to get back to their regular job.

            Still, for now, we need to arrange to give our representative abundant and appropriate support along with appropriate oversight. We are getting to know that there so many of us that no one person ever need to feel that they have too much to do. We will find ourselves learning by doing and by practicing our organization; and by becoming more aware of governance in our lives. We will need to practice communication skills and so maintain appropriate trust of fellow citizens. We will probably need to practice our co-operation skills and understanding of the organization close to us. Do not let me discourage you. There is virtually nothing which you really have to do, but much which you can do. Your governance activity is much like being empowered. Also you are the only one who can be you and you are an irreplaceable part of our taking care of ourselves just by being you. Better the best of you than the worst.

            Citizen Assemblies are a  good little example of doing much of what I am writing about. They are a real life demonstration of citizens co-operating to do some of their own governance. Citizen Assemblies are already one movement of effective citizen participation in their own governance. They once in a while seem much like an example of direct democracy. It is evident that these assemblies demonstrate how we can move toward active citizenship and toward the living conditions we desire. We can, as Daniel Stid has written, and I interpret here, bring true citizen perspectives to bear on policy making. We can refine our opinies through informed deliberations and judgements. Deliberations can be a kind of talking together which is much like thinking together.

            These assemblies are demonstrating in a relatively short time ordinary citizens are capable of learning to help their elected representative to help them. Relatively soon they can collectively learn to effectively remind their representatives of citizen needs and encourage them, daily if necessary, to address those needs. They can with some ease and persistence, improve their governance and directly help their representatives to do well. All there is to it is to do it together.

            Ordinary citizens are learning together to help their representatives to do that which they have been elected to do and to see it done or to know the reason why it is not done. Doing it together is the key. They learn to better work their government and we can too. They learn that it is their right and ability to make some changes or additions to the laws of the land. They learn that there are few laws against governance of the people, by the people, and for the people nor in their learning more of good governance and improved citizen activity as they practice their participation in governance of their nation, state, or county.

            Citizen Assemblies have worked out ways to move governments to actions congenial to their citizens. If Public Assemblies and citizen participation interests you or attracts you, you can check out their ways of working.You can check out much online. You can share that which you learn here when the urge strikes you.

            A Citizen Assembly is not the only way for us to work our governance and it is probably not the best way to do so. But, it is an excellent example of a way of doing so. You can find your own way to co-operative governance. Still, right now these Assemblies are worth looking into and learn something of how they work. Citizen Assemblies may be found in your country and online. They can be found in growing numbers in countries calling themselves republics.

            I tend to like co-operating with people who do their best work in clearly inclusive and democratic ways. However, even at my age, I can make some adaptations.

            I believe that this Citizen Assembly idea got started in England, spread to Ireland, then to France and beyond. Mr Stid, and important interpreter of the concept has written that "Ireland has set the pace" in the use of the Assemblies. Not all of the Assemblies are being used at the federal level yet. In the U.S., for example, they have been used at the state level, but mostly in an ad hoc sort of way. I this case I would like to see the organizations have some continuity, but that is not necessary for good work to be done.

            Well, that's about it for me for now. When you find info action related to improved citizen participation in governance, especially cooperative, democratic participation, please feel free to tell us about it. The Assembly way is not the only way. But it does seem that we may have matured enough to govern ourselves, to take care of ourselves together. It does seem time to begin the practice. When you tell me it is OK to publish that which you tell us about doings related to citizen participation we discuss ways of doings. Ways for citizens to democratically co-operate in governance are golden.
    

            Thank you for reading.




                                           Richard Sheehan

            



What's to Like in an Organization?

 Some of What I like 

I know that organization increases our power enormously. I know that our organization informs and educates us well.


                    We are capable of forgetting the pleasures and satisfactions  of organization. I expect that the pleasures and satisfactions I am recalling just now will not be the same as yours. Still among mine you may find one or two of yours.

                    I have an interest in ad hoc organizations and and those of longer term.
Below are many of my personal likes in organizations. You may find some of your likes listed.

An organization which attracts me often has:

~ members who feel connected, involve, and respected.
~ the motive of helping me and others to thrive.
~ a clear understanding of costs and benefits.
~ members who promote widespread participation and responsibility.
~ members who embrace reality and who are willing to approach the truth.
~ members who value honesty and justice.
~ a mission I find valuable and pleasing.
~ plenty of talk in which all participate.

An organization which pleases me is one which:
~ Keeps me in the information loop.
~ most members feel well connected with leadership.
~ Makes very clear who pays how much and who gets what.
~ moves in the direction of democracy.
~ tends to be inclusive.
~ tends to safeguard that which I value.
~ includes those who study and promote actions good for me and others.
~ advocates and protects people and process important to me.
~ promotes dialogue which leads to appropriate action.


I find an organization congenial when it includes:

~ teaching the process of organizing.
~ the purpose of advocating and protecting me.
~ objectives very like my own.
~ intelligent, respectful, loving ladies.

                I am very interested in hearing of your likes in organizations. I expect to post more about organization and organizing. Dialogue skills are organizational skills for all participants in society.

                Organizing can be a wonderful move toward governance.

                More as soon as I can.

                Thank you for reading. Take some time to explore this site. Well, you are right here!


                                                                                                            RCS





Citizenship and Governance

  A Consideration of Definitions and Meanings


                     You may have noticed that I am attracted to phrases like active democracy and active citizenship.

                    We seem to be pretty much on the same page as to the meaning of  "active" which includes concepts like: "capable of functioning," "causing movement or change," "participating," and like that, right? And also we have in common the idea that the U.S. has been and pretty much is a republic. A republic being a situation being  in which representatives and leaders are directly chosen by citizens and have their position at the will of the citizenry. No situation being static. The originators of republics did not what theocracies, dictatorships, kingdoms or even oligarchies. 

                    Many considered a republic to be an important step toward democracy. Democracy being a situation in which a growing percent of citizens were practicing governance. More people were learning to participate in their own government as mature adults. Republicanism and democracy seem excellent ideas for solid, stable, just modes of governance. Both call for ongoing learning and practice.

            So, citizenship is about the doings of citizens which is the practice of their own governance. Citizens are persons learning to take care of themselves and take care of their own governance. I imagine that we agree that the base meaning of democracy is governance by the people. A republic is much like that, the people being responsible for their government, but being a bit less active. Both democracy and republicanism are active processes. In both the job of governing is done in a lively way and a bit more so in a democracy.

                Where the people of either a republic or democracy lack practice, their government may fail.

                More can be said about governance. Most of use know a great deal about self government and much of it can be taking care of by ourselves. However, when our neighbors are throwing garbage in our street leading to the sickness of our children we know that some cooperation is in order. We could perhaps burn down the houses of  our offending neighbors but we realize that could lead to more problems. So, we have learned a great deal about co-operation. That co-operation is how we govern ourselves. We get our food and water in that way. When we refuse to take some responsibility for our mutual food, water, and garbage, we are likely to get worse food and water, and worse treatment of garbage. So, we have learned to practice cooperative governance for our benefit and that of our neighbors. Sometimes some of use forget that co-operation is a ongoing process.

                Even in our own families co-operation is not a one time affair, but an ongoing cooperation. We come to maintain accords with our families and neighbors, we often come to develop certain norms  and come to know that they must be practiced to be maintained. Cooperative practice usually takes communication. So, communication, practice, and co-operation are all part of governance and government.

                You may have discovered that a motor may spin out of control so people install a governor on it which slows it down or stops it. People have learned to put a governor on themselves, but have learned that some kind of governors are more likely to act up and get out of control and have learned that a drunken king is more likely to spin out of control than are the citizens of a republic.

                Governance can be seen as a kind of taking care of. We tend to get better care when we take some responsibility for that care. So, it is my hope that we will practice a governance of ourselves, our families, our town, our team, our county, and more. I believe there are plenty of use to do this without anyone feeling overloaded.

                Let me write more about citizenship. Most of us have been citizens and so know something about citizenship. Some tend to think of it as a set of rights, without thinking of the ongoing maintenance that those rights require. Citizenship is the practice of the skills of governance in of  a state as a recognized member or citizen of that state. Active citizenship is the practice and using those skills in a lively and active manner. Citizenship is usually a legal position having a set of rules and laws agreed on to regulate citizen behavior. In republics and democracies the rules and laws are made by the people. The laws and rules are usually not burdensome. However, in citizenship there are usually duties and rights which may be claimed by citizens. At time those claims may prove a burden. However, not claiming them often proves troublesome. Not claiming duties and rights can cause many personal and social losses. Not claiming ones duties and rights can cause the loss of rights, citizenship,liberty, duties, happiness, state, home, and life; not just one's own. but als one's family, friends, fellow citizens, happiness. The losses are likely to extend to those who may have been able to enjoy your state in years to come. When not so very many of us fail to claim and practice our rights and duties our state moves toward failure. The first deady step toward such failure is often the failure of dialogue about our cooperation. The first step in that dialogue is listening for understanding and meaning.

                    In perhaps all republics it is legal for a citizen to "lobby" other citizens. 'Lobby" is not a legal term. It's a good word, but it is very seldomly used in a legal documents, contracts, or courts. In definition, it could be the practice of doing what one can to persuade others, as might a teacher, preacher, propagandist, or other. However, it is more often used in persuading citizens or their representatives in legal or political situations to act in a way congenial to your purposes. Perhaps in routing traffic to avoid a school to prevent children from being struck by a vehicle while crossing the street in front of their school. Lobbying is much like milk, it can be good, bad, sour, sweet, etc. So there is honorable lobbying, but it is not always so. It is a word much used in modern politics.   

                    Lobbying can be a sort of encouragement. For example you could try to persuade fellow citizens to organize to help each other to practice teaching each one another about governance, citizenship, and organizing. Seems like a lot.  Trying to get your high school, school board to open a night school with that topic could be a case of lobbying. 

                    
                    There is a lack of knowledge about politics among us. It is the way we have come to work out our without violence or bloodshed. Some have come to think of  "politics" as a bad word and that it is not useful. The way we practice it is not great, but it is a lot better then killing one another. It would be better if we listened better for the other guys meanings, practiced more dialogue, and became a bit more active in our own governance it could be a lot better. Politics is much like milk is to many of us. It can be sweet and it can be sour, and it can become a bit cheesy. We just learn how to use it. Politics is a name of a way for a way we co-operate to govern ourselves. Like any job or duty, it can be done, poorly. or worse. 
Check online or your in or in your dictionary for the definition of politics. Pick out the best of what you find and you will come close to the way I usually use the word. In fact you can check out all the words like citizenship, government, republic, democracy, and others. Pick out the best of each and go for it.



Using our knowledge:

                  Anyway, I would be proud and pleased to be lobbied to be lobbied to be part of a group group dedicated to helping on another to learn the nature of and doing of politics, governance, democracy, republicanism, and citizenship. And also to learn about being a useful citizen of my neighborhood, city, town, county, state, or nation. It seems good to learn how to take care of our polity together.


                    As an American, as a citizen of the United States, I would like to learn with others about our Constitution including an up-to-date understanding of it's amendments.  And more importantly, how to use it in governance, democratically as a good citizen. Recently I have been mostly been thinking about being an effective citizen at the national level. However, it seems to make more sense to learn how a democratic republic is worked at the town or county level, or even at the neighborhood level in a city, or at  a school-board level, or in a number of ways closer to home. I believe one could learn to me more active at both a state or national level and at a local level and do so effectively with some satisfaction. By showing up at party meetings of  say the Green, Republican, or Democrat party, one might be able to learn more about local and national governance almost at the same time. Just a meeting of 3 or 4 or 7 or 11 of persons near me to consider how to better use our Constitution to govern ourselves could be instructive fun.

                    These days I find myself much less interested in candidates and parties and more interested in bills, issues, laws, and the workings of getting good important doings done and maintained. So, I could say my interests is more in platforms, planks and happy and proud citizens. I would also be pleased to have good orientations, good goals, and good successes. I find that the 20 or so national parties in the US still have and publish platforms and planks. With the US citizens reading here I would like to look over and consider some of those planks and discover the ones which of them are most liked and important among us. At the moment, planks with plans to promote citizen participation and education in democratic governance seems interesting to me. 

                    There are times when we feel that we can use all the help we can get. That be true or not. But there are times when help is very welcome and perhaps vital. Much of the time we need very little help and often that is all we get. However, there is much we could teach one another and doing that teaching could be very helpful. I think that it is possible to make time to be helped. It could be a pleasure to learn from an other or to teach an other. For example as we taught each other, we might learn more effective ways to support our better Representatives to work more effectively for our own good, the good of the country. With practice in doing this together even when our "goods" were not exactly the same, we could give impatice to happenings good for one another, our children and youth and for the state of our land in general. We can learn and practice as we will.


Practicing our knowledge

                We can learn a lot about our mutual governance and we can help each other to practice that which we learn. I have voted, demonstrated, read the newspaper, listened to news and watched it on TV. I use my computer to learn, gather information, and communicate. I have participated in campaigns and have attended political meetings a little. I have been teaching myself about self governance, active citizenship, and active democracy. I believe that I could make more progress in a group and enjoy it. I think that members of such a group can learn more, do more, and find more satisfaction than they can by only learning and doing as individuals.

                I sure don't want todo governance until I drop. I believe that there are ways to do enough without doing what feels like too much. One way to do that is to eliminate that which interests us least. I am now less interested in parties and candidates and am more interested in issues and planks. We are free and can portion our time as we will. Governance and politics entail more than candidates and parties; so, I can still be interested in politics when I want to. I can even try to help a candidate whom I believe can successfully move forward an issue important to me.

Show up

                An important part of citizenship, and of much else, is showing up. You can find opportunities to show up. Many find voting such an opportunity others find public demonstrations a welcome opportunity. The learning about issues important to one and sharing that learning with others is a opportunity for some to show up. Others find their opportunity in co-operating in the resolution and implementation of an issue. Others find theirs at a school board meeting or city council meeting. There are many ways to co-operate to keep, for example, your town, or your nation operating well. 

                To do anything well there is usually some learning to do. Practice is a great aid to learning. There is a limited amount that an individual can or wants to do. Nearly everyone has some ability to co-operate. Others have the ability to listen carefully. Some have said that one way not to spread oneself too thin is to think globally and to act locally. This sounds good and has helped some. Most of us can show up and listen and perhaps co-operate.

                We can show up and listen with the purpose of understanding. We could show where others are doing active citizenship democratically. Personally I find that listening at a school board meeting is more interesting than hanging out at my polling place. Thank goodness that we do not all have the same likes and dislikes.

                Some find city council meetings more interesting. Finding out where a given councilman likes to see city funds spent might interest me for a whole meeting. Political party meetings could be a place worth showing up at. One might find Green Party meetings where things are getting done is of interest. Listening to people where they are co-operating to act on an important social issue could interest another.

                Listening does not interest anyone forever, but it is often best to listen and understand enough to keep one's foot out of one's mouth before speaking much. So, it is best to listen a bit to see how active citizenship is being practiced in a given situation. By listening you can come to  better understand how active citizenship is practiced there and how the issue is understood.


Co-operation:

                We know something about co-operation and co-operating. Co-operating is a lot. It is an important and useful early and ongoing activity. It is important for citizenship, organization, and governance. It is a step toward well practiced governance. It is important to co-operate with one another and it is also beneficial to be aware of co-operating with our learning process. We can have some fun with awareness of this learning process it can keep us from being bored by believing that we know everything or even enough. To be effective active citizens we keep our co-operation skills in good shape. Remember one skill and practice is showing up.

                Perhaps we are setting ourselves, here and now, on the road to developing darn good governance skills. Perhaps our co-operation skills are developing into citizenship skills, which can lead us to active democracy and even real governance of the people, by the people, and for the people.

                I suspect that these interesting skills have begun to consider can lead to valuable and interesting side effects. Perhaps some of us can even upgrade some some individual self care skills which some believe are part associated with political self governance. We can also upgrade our communication skills, especially the oral communication skills of groups.

                So, practicing care of ourselves individually and as part of a polity is important to good citizens and to good citizenship. And, we often find that taking part in democratic conversation group is a practical and fun practice.

                We could even begin to consider how to increase our understanding of the nature of self governance as a form of taking care of our selves individually, politically, socially, publically, nationally, and more. Some consider accepting such responsibility a pleasing honor. We can learn much from one another and each other. It is well done with showing-up and co-operating. There is a big variety of useful, interesting and fun doings and happenings which come with increased understanding the sharing of care. That includes the process of governance, especially when done with active citizenship and democracy.


Active:

                It's about doing. Some citizens want to better understand the intentions and practices of their presten government, be it town or national. Some consider how to do that. Consideration is good and almost active. When  your consideration leads you to a town council meeting you are active. Others want to understand the gathering and sharing of information which is of value to fellow citizens. Attending a meeting of active citizens can be considered a purposeful doing of an active citizen. Your doings your activities are up to you. Some get active organizing meetings or gatherings. Some find planks or issues which feel important and they find a way to support that plank or issue. Some look at alternatives to self governance and bring their findings to others. Others do what they can to bring a bit more active democracy to public meetings. Some find it satisfying and easy to get active in party politics.

                Just sharing some info here can count as active. Tell what you find out about real active democracy doings or the doings of active citizens, including yourself.

                This essay or post is different from many of my posts in that it is both longer than many and more chatty than most. I hope it includes values for you.

                Healthy citizenship.

                Thank you for reading!




                                                                                                        RCS

         



        

Co-operation: vital to governance

 Governance begins with co-operation and ends without co-operation.


Co-operation:              

                        We know what co-operation is and we have some idea of how to do it. It takes some attention and practice. It's working together, sometimes with no boss. For a wise man it is working together for our mutual benefits with the clear awareness that it benefits each of us personally as well. With practice we can make it work for us very well. 

                        C0-operation is an art or craft that nearly all of us know something about. It is a bit like "If you'll scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" So, its a reciprocal process. Even so, there is much that we can learn about it. I believe that we can and should learn more of the use and practice of co-operation.

                        Co-operation can lead us to friendship, trust, brotherhood, and sisterhood to. We learn more about people in co-operation by: working with them, observing them, listening to them, and talking with them. 

                        Co-operation is vital for self-governance. For me self governance is taking care of ourselves. Taking care of one's self is mostly a co-operative affair these days, even though it is still much like being one's own boss. We also do self-governance together with others for our mutual benefit. Governance can be about government and Government with a capital G. Government can be about taking care of our state, city, town, school, or about finding a place to put up a basketball court, planning how to do it, and doing it. Of course doing this kind of governance is best done with co-operation, we work together. In democratic governance the working together can bring especially good effects.

                        Co-operating may be humanities best activities. It is certainly one of our most useful activities. One of our greatest powers as a society is the power to co-operate for our common good. Co-operation is a powerful good and an important step in organization.

                      
Organization:
                        Co-operation can usually includes being supported by those you support or being helped by those you help. It can be long term as in a family, a business, or a county, but it can be short term as in a piece of work for a limited purpose. Organization is very similar.

                        Just knowing something about what co-operation is, gives us a reason to practice it with some gratitude. we know that we can work together for our mutual good. Doing so in a democratic way can be even more satisfying because the individuals so co-operating because of the satisfying feeling of equality. Each co-operator is valued. We know that working together can get us through some tough times. In tough times it can keep us safe. In better times it improves our chances for an abundant life among supportive others. Well organized co-operation can do so even more effectively.

                        Co-operation can be particularly important in hard times and not just at critical moments  or in urgent cases, but in every-day difficult times. Who has live a year with no difficult times. It is sometimes difficult to get through a month in which a little co-operation would have helped. Its a nice feeling that there are people are around to help even when you don't need it. In some tough times some co-operation could have helped me, but I didn't realize what I had to offer. However, over the years men and women have worked out effective and informal ways of getting to better days. We practiced co-operation in clubs, families, unions businesses, towns, cities, counties, and other organizations.

Without co-operation, organization may be impossible:

                        It is especially useful to co-operate well in times of unusually rapid change. Earth changes such as climate change seems to be getting to be that kind of change. It is possible for us to organize to better adapt to Earth changes such as climate change.

Dialogue is necessary for nearly all  good co-operation and organization:

                        Very often I use the word "dialogue" to refer to a special kind of talk. For us, right now, let it just mean good listening and clear talk. We can come to know one another better and to co-operate better. We can greatly improve our chances for effective co-operation by listening to each other better and talking with one another honestly. Listening and talking for meaning and understanding helps us to more effectively co-operate. Our ongoing dialogue is important.

                        For a higher level of co-operation, a more effective mode of communication is very useful. Face to face dialogue is an example of a mode of communication. I such dialogue we listen for meaning and understanding. We often benefit greatly from learning to co-operate with persons very different from ourselves. We come to listen more effectively for their meanings and their understandings. Their life experience is likely to have been significantly different from ours so they may have learned a point of view different from ours. Its that better listening leads to better co-operation and more effective organization. We can practice better listening. As we know, we can better co-operate by informing and being informed so as to come to necessary understandings. 


Practices which can aid co-operation, governance, dialogue, and effective organization:

Good practices include:

~ sharing leadership.
~  offering suggestions rather than commands.
~ showing gratitude, praise, and respect for co-operation which effectively moves us closer to achieving our common goals.
~ doing useful work. 
~ appreciating the import of our common efforts and aims.
~ sharing our understanding of our common benefits.
~ trying to really understand the problem.
~ trying to understand the other guy's ideas.
~ explaining the reasons for requests and rules.
~ taking turns talking, listening, waiting, leading, getting things done.
~ practicing participation.


                        Share your additions, corrections, questions, and comments related to this comment just below, in "comments." It may say "no comments." Click on it anyway.

                        Thank you for your visit.




                                                                                                RCS

Group: Random Considerations On Its Nature

 Self and Group

                    There are those of us who know more about than we know about ourselves. A family is a group of sorts. There are those who realize that knowledge of self and knowledge of group are are, very often, best developed in tandem. Or,   more fully said, that some have come to realize that our understanding in one area can get so far ahead of the other that our development in both is limited. And, that when our development falls enough behind the other, the development of both is hindered. So, that which you are learning about the use of self can help you in your use of group. Also development of your power in the use group can improve your ongoing self development.

                   So it is that most of us benefit by ongoing development of our understanding of self and that of group, without letting understanding in one get to far ahead the other. So I could say that participation in group is good for self development. And that is just the beginning. Group knowledge leads to knowledge of dialogue and co-operation, which leads to the better use of organization. And the practice of these steps seem to lead to the better practice of collective self-governance.

                    A prime injunction of wisdom teachings has been, "Know thyself." This injunction has been up there close to the one Christ taught on the nature of love. Wisdom teachings also suggest that learning which leads to understanding and meaning may be the prime purpose of human being and also that the first important learning is of self. So, gaining understanding in self helps one to gain understanding of group. As we come to improved doing of group we come to better understand ourselves. And, so on. We seem to be creatures of great curiosity who seem to love getting more meaning into our lives.

                    Learning seems to aid our knowing and and understanding. Observation and practice aids our learning. It may be good for us to realize that there is a lot to learn, know, and understand. Learning, knowing, and understanding seems to stroke and stoke our curiosity and to also to feed our hungry minds with meaning. These doings can be done alone and may also be better done co-operating in a group.   

                    You may believe that learning is an important part of being. You may have found that it can often be fun and that it is almost always be satisfying. Others and sometimes our vary selves have made it unpleasant. Some agree that learning is often best when one follows his or her bliss.

                    I believe that learning about groups is a great way to learn about ourselves, our world, and our collective self-governance. My experience informs me that there are many qualities of learning. You might want to consider the quality of your recent learning. Who you are now and the nature of your present situation effects that quality. Right now it may be effected by my writing. 

                    These days much of my writing is affected by the way we are not governing ourselves and the way we are doing so little to help each other to better practice governance. Two ways I see to better the situation were there is the will to do so. One way is centered on face to face groups of less than 40. The other is centered on particular way of speaking among one among one another; it might be called a democratic dialogue.
                    
                      Thank you for reading this far. The following will be not


Participation in a Group

                    Participation in a certain group at a certain time can be a pleasure or a pain. At the same time it is nearly always a learning experience. That learning and that experience will be of varying quality. Much of that learning can lead to valuable knowledge of self. Awareness of that possibility can aid the quality of your learning and your life.
    
                    There are many kinds of groups; examples include hobby groups, civic service, political group, self-help group, religious groups and there are many different variations of each kind of group. Recently I have thought of being a participant in two learning/study groups: one dealing with more effective group dialogue the other about the nature and practice of citizen governance.

                Governance group might deal schools and utilities. Another governance group might might be interested in the democratic governance of all kinds of groups, another group may be formed to look at the democratic intent of  the US constitution. You may be interested in new ways of managing a corporation. Or, you might enjoy participating in a fly fishing and fly tying group, a sane dating group, or a music appreciation group.

                You might find your group useful, interesting, and a joy for more reasons than I can imagine. Each group can a learning experience on two levels one can be through  your observation of the nature of the group and its interests and the other your observation of your participation in the group.

                Of course, one group can be more useful, pleasant, or interesting than another is to and to others. Some will be better suited to your personality or to your deeper self then are others.

                Some groups are more transitory than are others. While others prove lasting enough to prove very useful to their members. A significant number of these longer lasting groups can become  social tools as well as well as a sort of schools well adapted to its members.

                The probability of success among these groups is increased by a high level of participation by a large percentage of  a groups membership. This participation has strengthened both the effectiveness and the longevity of groups. Also groups of a democratic nature often prove to be more effective in the long run.

                Surely an important part of being is learning. Learning about the world around us can be an important move toward learning about ourselves, as learning about ourselves can be vital to coming to a better understanding  of our world. I believe that the learning we can do in groups is important to learning about self, our world, and self governance.

                My experience informs me that there are many qualities of learning and that learning in one area is supportive of learning in other areas. You may have become aware that learning of governance, and how to do it, is important to me. My interest includes both that of the individual self-governance of each of us, and our collective mutual self-governance.

                It is fair for you to check to see how much of that which I am writing makes useful good sense to you. If it does seem to make useful good sense to you, take note. You may find that is truly important to your life. If you think that it may be of ongoing usefulness to you, but that you also have questions related to it then please ask those questions. If  the "comments" section just below seems not to be working, use the "comments" section of any one of the associated blogsites available sites here. To do so mention the name of this post and the name of this site in your post to "comments." I will try to respond in the "comments" section or in a post. It may be useful to use your name or a nom de plume. 

                Below you may find more about the nature of group and group participation. 


Participation in a Group


                Participation in a group is a learning experience. The quality of that experience will be of varying quality. However what you learn and the quality of that learning will be very much up to you. Your learning can lead to valuable knowledge of  yourself. Awareness of the possibilities of your learning can enhance the the quality of your learning and of your life.

                Groups can be organizations, very well organized and effective organizations. In groups and organizations it is important to each one that each member knows and has in mind that he or she is important to the organization, to its longevity, to it's value to each member and the collective, to the congeniality of membership, and more. For the good of the group and of individual members it is best that each member has a place in the organization and and valued activity/job. Being a practicing participatory democracy tends to increase the level participation in a group and to increase its value to one and all.

                You have the power to have a group. A local face to face is usually best. You can enjoy the power and usefulness of the group and your strength, growth, and development in it. Its fair to make a group of your own when you become so inclined. You can visit the  dialogue site here for some ideas.

                Let's say that you get info about a group which seems interesting. You can probably attend a few meetings to see what its like. Showing up is an important step. You can join it for a time if it seems congenial. 

                What's next? You could do this: Analyze your group or organization to better know it and perhaps yourself. Doing such an analysis can help you to participate in it more effectively and more completely enjoy its benefits.

Activities to Help You to Better Understand A Group

To start you, or you and a friend, can begin to carry out some of the activities suggested just below:
~ Find out who in the group has authority to implement group plans. Doing so will lead you to many questions which may have illuminating answers.
~ Know the action plan for long range funding of your organization as a group. this leads to more interesting questions.
~ Find out who is involved in developing your strategic plan. You may now be learn some diplomacy; and to have some new questions: What plan? What strategy? What involvement? What's going on?
~ Know your membership trends. Is membership increasing or decreasing? Why?
~ What is the nature of the groups benefits for you and others? Just what are they?
~ Who is doing the bulk of the work to accomplish the group goals? Just what are those goals? What work?
~ Which people to the work? What jobs are there to do? Who makes the meeting place available and ready to use? Where are the job doers?
~ Consider the nature of the group's for you and for others.
~ Make sure you know the engines of your group. How are members motivated. What keeps them coming back?


Group as an Example of an Organization

                A Group is an organization. Both or or either one can keep you as busy as you like. Your group ought to feel congenial to you.

                You might set out to find answers to the following questions as aids to your growth, pleasure, and power and that of other members of your group:
~ What questions do you have about your group/organization? What questions do you have about your membership in it?
~ How will you get answers to those questions? 
~ What will you do about your questions and answers? What can you do. What would you rather do? What would you do about the questions and answers when you had the help of other members?
~ What makes your group operate? What makes you operate? What makes you and other members co-operate?
~ What motivates you observe the doings of members? Do you consider your motivations for doing so. Do you consider what seems to be their their motives for doing what they do.

                Keep in mind that in a group, it is not mandatory that you search for answers to your questions by yourself. Your group is for doing together.

                Enjoy your growing power and the growing power of your group. You support your group's power and your group supports yours.

                Take, or make the opportunity to learn more about you.

                Thank you for reading. Please feel free to tell me what you got out of it.



                                                                                        Richard S.