Showing posts with label freedom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label freedom. Show all posts

Noam Chomsky - The Crisis of Democracy

 The name of the the report sounds dishonest to me. Democracy points to our participation in our governance. That is what democracy is, right? We must learn to govern so that we may have income, honor, freedom, dignity, and understanding. and    understanding. This a very young Chomsky!


                                                    rcs



For a Pleasant and Useful Behavior

We can practice talking among ourselves.



            It seems time to begin speaking to one another about that which is important to us. By us, I mean more than friends, family, political party, or religion, although those dialogues too are very important. I mean, for example, a better cross-section of your town, or city. So, it seems important to learn some new and useful dialogue skills. Our willingness to try and to practice such skills can take us to a better society, to better governance, and to a lot of personal satisfaction.

            I heard on TV recently, a suggestion to be informed, connected, and invested. It got me interested. I thought it seemed a good idea to be well informed, well connected, and well invested in our society. I also thought that it might well take more thought.

            I have also thought that it is good for our well-being to practice freedom, equality, brotherhood, and even goodness. It thought that it would be even better if it were practiced in our daily lives inclusively all over our land. It does seem kind of a good direction to try to go, doesn't it?

            The above suggestions and thoughts seemed could perhaps be more effectively done when they included the practice of participatory governance. Even, if it does not include this and much of the above, some talking together about that which is important to us does seem a very good idea. 

            Fairly early in such talk we need to understand meanings, and to talk them over until we have abundant mutual understanding of what we are talking about. Such talking over must not end. our talk must continue if we are to act together.

            Words are important for the meanings they carry. "Governance" may be easier to understand and taken in than is "democracy" or even "participation." The phrase "participatory democracy" may be newer and more important to understand than one may imagine at first. It is important that we come to a  fuller understanding of each others' understanding or it becomes difficult to act cohesively.

            If  we are to co-operate effectively we need to keep aware of our understandings which are mutual at the present time and those which are not. Doing so necessitates ongoing dialogue on meanings and understanding of phrases such as:
~ Well informed about the nature of our society
~Well connected with others in our society
~ Our citizenship
~ The practice of supporting freedom to and freedom from.
~ The nature of equality in society and in governance.
~ The nature of and importance of brotherhood and goodness in our daily lives
~ The meaning of and the great value of inclusiveness in the maintenance of an effective we and and effective us in our doings.

            These phrases and ones like them have not been used much among us recently. To develop. enough common understanding of them among us may take a lot of talking-over. Many of us already believe that the practice of talking-over is very important now. We are capable of learning to dialogue well enough to become a satisfying and effective us. We are capable of helping our children to develop their dialog power to better effect than we have. 

            Our good talk can guide us to action that leads our humanity to survive and thrive.

            You are more than welcome to comment.

            Thank you for reading.

Commitment to One Another and Show up as a Citizen

Your Belief in Democracy


How to revive your belief in democracy | Eric www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqKYtA3pK1c&t=611s


            Show up as a citizen. Share your civic ideals, values , and morals in face to face fellowship. Let your democratic values be a bit like your religion. Learn more about the doing of democracy.

Do it right now

 Get together a small group      


                These few words are directed to citizens of the USA and anyone else who is curious.

                The purpose of the groups I speak of is teaching one another about the nature a value of what could be called participatory governance, trust and cooperation in a group, the actual working of government in the US, theoretic nature of republics and democracy, and that which the group decides to learn the workings of. I hope it will be about participation. It could about participatory democracy.

                It could be about freedom. What freedom? It could be the freedom to cooperate in taking care of one another in a fair and meaningful way.

                Some important rules for a strong group include:
No enemies.
Each member has frequent and equal opportunity to speak to the whole attentive group.

        A  good start can be sitting down and listening to one another; hear each other. An important purpose is to begin to trust each other a bit more. Appropriate trust is a great power. 

            Begin. Start right now.

            Thank you for reading.



                                                                                    Richard 

Do No Harm (or try a bit harder to avoid it)

Our more recent wars


            You can begin an exploration of our wars on History With RCS. Use one or more of the various search apps there and begin searching: war, wars, or our wars.
The apps Labels or Archives are useful tools and may be good places to begin your search.

            In this piece I will remark on the nature of some of our more recent wars. They were often call wars on ''terror.'' That, to me, seems a misnomer. In my experience wars are made on people by people. They are made on men and usually include women and children, not to mention youths.These days they usually result in the death and maiming of more noncombatants than combatants. The purpose of most wars is killing men and so crushing their power. Other purposes have included vengeance and taking over resources. Less often, it is for protection from actual invaders. The results of most war are ugly and include: rage, hatred, and death, of puppies,  grandmothers, babies, garden plants, plus the usual men, women, ect.

            I have heard it suggested that by becoming better at avoiding war and other killing we give ourselves a chance for a better life. Wise men have said that by trying to do no harm we make more room for health and happiness in our lives. This sounds right but people do experience anger, rage, fear, and an urge to vengeance. All feelings which can lead to unpleasant actions. But these days we often kill in rather cold blood when someone of authority tells to do so. Luckily we can sometimes do so by pushing a button or pulling a lever and never having to see the results.

            Many of our recent wars do not seem to be resulting in lasting goodness. They have led to the deaths of many including wives and mothers, which resulted in the considerable rancor among survivors. In those wars social organizations were disassembled, infrastructure and other physical resources destroyed. unmeasured damage to our environment resulted as well as partially measured damage to our economies resulted. Another result was the wounding, deadening,
and mangling of hearts, minds, and souls of survivors. Doings and happenings which may be worth considerable effort to avoid.

            Still, peace at any cost is not very peaceful and too often of little good. If peace and war extremes, there is likely a mean between them which could be a golden mean. Diplomacy, negotiation, and dialogue toward mutual understanding could be ways to better ways then killing one another.

            Just the better use of language could prove useful. Instead of  war on Syria or on Ukraine, it may be more realistic, and true, to say war on Syrians and war on Ukrainians. We can be reminded that human persons feel more pain and loss than does a country and thus act more carefully, but maybe not.

            I understand terror as being a strong fear. I may be pleased to scare the hell out of an invader of my home and be pleased if he were terrified. However, it is usually best to alleviate fear. Reactions to fear can be unpleasant. Killing people is not a good way to alleviate fear except from the dead. The dead are no longer terrorized, but the friends, family, and countrymen may have lasting anger to express. It seems good policy to consider alternatives to killing and terrorizing. Dialogue for understanding can be an effective alternative.

            Those who have been called terrorists have been considered patriotic heroes. They have often been those struggle against a much stronger foe. Some French men and women did a fair job of terrorizing German occupiers. American Colonists did a bit of a job on English military and others before and during the American Revolution. The Irish used some terror tactics to become a nation once again after perhaps a 1,000 years of troubles.

            War is often not always the best way of  dealing with strong fear or the greater discomfort which is terror. 

            From the perspective of an American citizen I note that the ability to choose to make war or not was once directly up to American citizens. War was usually honorably declared and in most cases it was up to the citizens to decide to declare war. So, it was up to them to be very clear as why we should systematically kill other humans. Many found that distasteful and so gave up their right and responsibility of making war or not. Humans can be a peculiar lot.

            I am am an American, a citizen of the United States so I hope you can excuse me for using us as examples.  We have neglect many of our own rules and laws dealing with war. We gave up much of our rule over our armed forces  and so let them be move toward being more like a mercenary organization. Not everyone is of this opinion and I can understand why. We, the citizens, gave up much of our power over the financing of American wars. No war was to be finance for over two years unless we voted for that financing. It seems many felt that unreasonably aukward. Taking time each two years to reconsider our reason for killing of humans seemed unreasonable to some so the process was simplified. At one time we were are armed forces, each man of age served at very little pay with a lot of patriotism. So, it was not so easy to kill when we had to do it ourselves. But that did not seem fair. As we had given up much of our war making powers why should we have to serve for little more than patriotism. So, we gave up the idea of a citizen armed forces and paid others a more mercenary like amount to do the fighting. Now we have we have better paid professional soldiers  who war to make a living, and for the country. Now it is easier, for us as a nation, to kill people we do not know and have never attacked us. Are armed forces do the killing with do deliberation or decision to do so on their part! At times we have not even heard that a certain people were being killed in our name with our resources! Sad happenings when a people give up governing themselves. Democracy can seem very far away. 

            Now we let our resources be used to kill strangers in their own land and perhaps their home while making no decision to do so! This now seems a continual activity. Now the killing from high in the sky without witnessing the happening.  Or, we can arm others to do so for us. Killing is paid for with resources which were once ours without thought or feeling on our part. We can easily make believe that it is not happening because we have abdicated our responsibility as citizens of a republic. With hazy eyes we do not see that we are residents of what seems very much like an empire. Still we have certain memories buried deep within, of honorable responsibilities and freedoms.

            How beautiful were are doings. How clearly we envisioned our republic moving toward democracy.

            Have we really let our republic slip through our fingers without a thought or care? It seems so. Are we giving a thought about the kind of people we want to be? It seems not. Are we willing to, at least, talk about it? Are we, we. or strangers whose thoughts are strange? 

            I believe that we can still an us, a we. I believe we have the courage to reclaim our freedom to govern ourselves. We can practice taking care of ourselves together and give ourselves a chance to revive our early purpose.

            We can learn again by doing again. We do not have to give up.

            You have read this. That is something. Thank you.

           I did not mean to write this much about ourselves, but it feels right to have done so.



                                
                                                                                        richard sheehan


Europeans, Vampires, Republicans, and Democrats.

            Collective Self-Governance   

             Perhaps we are at the point of losing our right to take care of ourselves, which is our right to self-governance, because we do not know who we are. We do not know each other because we do not practice good organization and communication. While we do not talk among our selves well a co-operate well, how are we to know who we are? While we did not do well together that which we were doing together 40 years ago, and do not remember much of what we were doing 300 years ago, and practically less what was happening to us only 2,000 years ago, and are not even sure how we nearly lost it all, what Have we decided to do to take care of ourselves tomorrow? How do we intend to send to participate in our governance to give our next generation a good chance of surviving and thriving? Are we acting like we don't care or pleading ignorance?  I think that most of us do care most of the time. Ignorance is not an excuse. We mostly learn by doing and paying attention to that which we do. Let's do something now. We can attend to or doing and to the results and then use our observations to make our doings good. You and I do not have too much to do because their are millions to help us. We are the people. Even just you and I personally co-operating with 30 or 40 need not have much to do.

                    The more we are careless of ourselves the more we are likely to become slaves of a new kind. The kind that are not valued, even as slaves, because most no longer have any use for slaves. They become almost at type of sub-human who have not practiced self-governance and cannot even imagine self-governance, much less than practice it. I am talking about us. I still have some memory of an us which practiced much more civic organization and who, at least practiced local self governance, and some organization to protect ourselves from some of the natural depredations from farther afield. 

                    When we care so little for ourselves that we seem careless of ourselves, might not others finally take advantage of us, or just push aside from the goods of this world and Earth. We remembered ideas of fairness and justice and concepts of governance to support fairness and justice among us. We called those ideas republicanism and democracy and loved them enough to pay dearly for them. Many of us did much toward the development of democratic republics.

                    We had a good game going. It has a kind of great rally. Then, often real reasons, we dropped the ball, then lost it, and then forgot it. Some of our great grandfathers did not learn about about self-governance well. A look at history can tell you why.  Our grandfathers learned a bit about it, but began to see it as something in the hands of others and did not support their schools in teaching its nature and practice. Our parents scarcely imagined supporting our schools in teaching us our history or that which once seemed to be our birth rights. Some us are learning some of our history now, and perhaps a few more are remembering that we are collectively responsible for taking care of ourselves. Some say it is never to late to learn and never to late to value our responsibly. I wonder if one dinosaur ever told another dinosaur that they would never lose their position and perhaps their very being. 

                    Our culture and who we are 

                    Some learned that Vlad was bad vampire. It seems that the truth of the matter is, he represents an example of the best of many of, perhaps all, of us of European extraction. He did much to save Europeans from invasions from the East. But more importantly he represented those Europeans who were not crushed by Greco-Roman culture of classical times after the fall of the Late Bronze Age, but learned from it and learned to adapt it to their own benefit. A part of that new culture to which they adapted seemed congenial to many of them. It came with the name "democracy." "Democracy" gathered and named a whole little bundle of ideas and values they already had, and clarified them. Vlad may have never been a republican or democrat, but he was one of those who adapted Greco-Roman culture to greater Europe. He even came to speak a Latinized language.

                The classical culture of the longish Greco-Roman have been heading toward Vlad by 2,000 BC or not long after the fall of the Late Bronze Age cultures. It continued to reach him and beyond to as recently as the recent 1400s! That culture touches us less, but still with some meaning to this very day. It seems we have had to reclarify the meaning of democracy a couple of time since Vlad's time. Maybe we can revivify it again today. We need to take up our responsibility in some way soon, or it is likely that we will believe that we no longer deserve the power of responsibility and freedom. Our continued loss of the "weness," which we have called unity, will, for a time, be more unpleasant than that we have already begun to experience.

                Civic responsibility is not a part of every culture                

When we fail to enjoy our responsibility we lose our civic strength, energy, and power and finally our being. We could lose our all, even with good use of our power of responsibility, but with responsibility our power to survive and thrive is strongly supported. 

                Please help me to proof read this piece.

               Let hear from you. I love to hear comments on content.

               Thank you for reading!

            


We Can Do Democracy

 Governance With RCS: YouTube tells that I cannot show this video with  R. Nadar in Colombia.

                

             It seems that someone belives we are not all ready to practice self-governance. They are probably right.

 I'll repeat what I had to some time ago about this nice little video:

                Forty years of lack of practice are resulting in loss of our hard one democracy. We have passed our governance into the hands of others and now we are passing into superfluoueness. Do we believe ourselves useless?

                I suggested to U.S. citizens that a reread of Our Declaration of Indepence may be useful. When we do not use it we lose it.

                Nadar is reminding us of that which we can do. Listen carefully for what can be done. He says that it takes only about 1% of us to be strongly effective an I believe that he is correct. However, if we will not teach 20% of us to do democracy we may not deserve it.

                We can learn to do it by doing it, has been said. I have heard it said that "practice makes perfect."  I do not believe that; however, from experience, I know it helps. Who has told us the meaning of democracy and how we can work it? Know matter, we can find out for ourselves.

                We already know something about co-operation, and some of us have usefuk ideas about democratic organization. We have begun on the way to taking care of ourselves and that is the way of self-governance. 

                We can learn how to more effectively co-operate and organize. Some of our grand- parents and great grandparents did. 

                Some of our youth have good ideas of freedom: freedom to claim duties, freedom to claim rights, freedom to claim free communication, free elections, and more. And they already know that very little comes to us without a cost.

                Check the meaning of superfluous and of democracy.


                                                                                                                    by Richard

Free, Democratic, and Inclusive

 History With RCS: Cossack, Ukrainian, and Free

 

                Cossacks have been free men and democratic. They have only been known to history since about 650 AD. They have been active in self-governing communities for well over a thousand years. They have been open, inclusive, with a Slavic bent. They knew a world from Siberia to Lithuania and up and down for many years, but were drawn to a certain land.

                The Ukrainian Cossack State was formed in about 1650 in what is now central Ukraine. Their leaders were elected.

                Through the years they have been few. Democracy is not easy. They experienced much, and stayed free among strong neighbors such as Poland, Russia, and Lithuania. Among such neighbors they continued to show a strong will for self-governance.

                They formed the Ukrainian Peoples Republic in 1917 to 1921, the western Ukrainian Peoples Republic 1918 to 1919, and the Ukrainian Peoples Republic in exile  from 1920 to 1992.

                They were among the very first members of the Soviet Union with its promise of self-governing citizens. They may have been the first to leave that Union when it showed little will to self-governing citizenship.

                They were among the charter members of the United Nations with its promise of a chance for peace and freedom. They have not given up on their fellow members yet. 

                Ah, yes, I believe that at the breakup of the Soviet Union the were left with one of the greatest stock of atomic weapons on Earth and gave up that stock to the U.N.

                They have been few and still are. They are still a mixture of races, nationalities, and religions. They are a free democratic people self selected from that mixture.

                We might mention that while all this was going on they, with the help of a few viking Norsemen, created Russia. Oh, and they had a modern republic type written constitution in 1710.

                I believe that a history of the cultures most effecting these people could be traced back another 4,000 years. However, before about 650 AD they were little recognized in history as a discrete people. Throughout perhaps a thousand years of their history they stayed freer, more democratic, and inclusive than most. They have had to defend themselves and they have. They have also kept the hope and faith that they could live a free people among free people. They have  seen inclusiveness, freedom, and democracy disappear like smoke again and again. Still they hold a vision of that freedom and self governance closer and dearer than do most.

               Please feel free to correct this work or add to it in the "comments" section below or just to click on a social media button just below.

                Ukraine. 

                Thank you for reading.

 

                                                                                    rcs

 


American Mythology and the Loss of Democracy

Governance With RCS: It's hard to lose democracy, but it can get very rusty from lack of practice.               

             Decades of lack of practice are resulting in a loss of our hard won democracy. We are governed by others and are now on our way to passing into superfluousness. 

            Read our Declaration of Independence. When we don't use it, we lose it.

            Nader is reminding us of that which we can do. Listen carefully for what can be done. 

            Also he says that it takes only about 1% of us to be strongly effective. 20% is much better.

            We can learn to do it by doing it.

            We must learn more about cooperation and organization. 

            We must learn how to more effectively cooperate and organize. 

            We may also benefit from reconsidering the nature of freedom, as in free press, free communication, free elections, freedom of privacy and more about free men and women.  
 
            Without active citizenship and active self-governance we become useless.

            Do you remember what superfluousness means?





                                                                    by Richard