Showing posts with label Russia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Russia. Show all posts

Peon, to Pawn, to Active Citizen?

 

The Russian Revolt of 1905               

                  The Russian revolt of 1905 included mass political unrest, which in turn, included terrorism, strikes, military mutinies, and urban demonstrations. This led the tzarist government to establish a limited constitutional monarchy including a duma which a parliament.

The Use of Democracy           

                The use of democracy is designed to prevent the worst of the above. The educated use practice of democracy can prevent the most of  the negative and bad imaginable.

Nicolas II

                The October Manifesto of 1905 in Russia was issued by tzar Nicolas II. Sergei Witte was influential in its production. I pledged to grant civil liberties to the people including: freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of assembly and also provided broad participation in the Duma. No law could come into force without the consent of the duma. The tzar retained veto power.

                Nicolas II was Nicolai II Alexandrovich Romanov. He was the last tzar of the nearly300 years of the Romanov dynasty rule of Russia. Sergei Witte was a Russian statesman who served as first prime minister of the Russian empire, replacing the tzar as head of government. Witte had a good understanding of the use of republicanism, but may have lacked enough understanding of all the powers extent in Russia.

Organized Powers

                The still well organized powers in Russia brutally suppressed constitutional law, congressional power, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, participation in the Duma, and similar activities.

American People

                The America people still have much to learn about the practice of republicanism and democracy. Americans can still co-operate socially, but are now finding it difficult to organize effectively.

Governance Was Collapsing
                Tsar Nicolas II abdicated in 1917. The Russian people were unprepared to govern, governance was collapsing. Powerful people tried to use war to pull the country together. They failed. The people began to look to the far right and far left. The happy medium, the golden mean, was lost. The had to little practice a self-governance.

The Bolsheviks
                The Bolsheviks were a small well organized group of persons with some understanding of governance took power. They were mostly a small faction of the Marxist Russian Democratic Labor Party. The were well organized and founded the Soviet Union.


Self-Governance              

                We have more to learn about self-governance. The Russians had a lot to learn of republican governance and still do. They have not practiced ongoing self-care. We seem to have forgotten how to practice republican governance much less democratic governance.              


The Russian People

                The Russian people did withstand counter revolution, experimental economic police, rapid expansion, war, Stalin, and more war. It was brutal, brutal do, in great part, to the lack of practice in governance of large parts of the Russian people as much as to any resistance.

                As time went on, imperialism and capitalism did not seem to work for them and they had not learned how to work a republic or a democracy. They seemed to have their idea of democracy a social democracy to make it included all of them.

                The great mass of the Russian people seem to have moved from being peons to being pawns. Oh, when will they ever learn. When will we ever learn to play our own game. When will we learn to take care of ourselves politically, socially, civically, civicly? (civicly should be a word.)

                There is a lot for us to learn and to remember. Luckily there are plenty of us to do so and we still remember a lot about co-operation.

                Thank you for reading.



                                                                                            rcs


                
                
                







A Good Reason Not to Love History

Mago Bill: A good reason not to love History.                    


                     
                It is not all about Ukraine. It's about us too. Yes, You and me. Please try to check the history or to find someone who can. It may be difficult to take, but can help us stay sane. Help us to learn more. Use the "comments" section below. You can comment anonymously if you wish. Honor and honesty appreciated.



                       




                  It may be difficult to take, but can help us stay sane. The thing is that history gets too real for to many. Still most of us still know that reality is good for us and reality is  good to learn from.


                                                                                                                            rcs

                       

Free, Democratic, and Inclusive

 History With RCS: Cossack, Ukrainian, and Free

 

                Cossacks have been free men and democratic. They have only been known to history since about 650 AD. They have been active in self-governing communities for well over a thousand years. They have been open, inclusive, with a Slavic bent. They knew a world from Siberia to Lithuania and up and down for many years, but were drawn to a certain land.

                The Ukrainian Cossack State was formed in about 1650 in what is now central Ukraine. Their leaders were elected.

                Through the years they have been few. Democracy is not easy. They experienced much, and stayed free among strong neighbors such as Poland, Russia, and Lithuania. Among such neighbors they continued to show a strong will for self-governance.

                They formed the Ukrainian Peoples Republic in 1917 to 1921, the western Ukrainian Peoples Republic 1918 to 1919, and the Ukrainian Peoples Republic in exile  from 1920 to 1992.

                They were among the very first members of the Soviet Union with its promise of self-governing citizens. They may have been the first to leave that Union when it showed little will to self-governing citizenship.

                They were among the charter members of the United Nations with its promise of a chance for peace and freedom. They have not given up on their fellow members yet. 

                Ah, yes, I believe that at the breakup of the Soviet Union the were left with one of the greatest stock of atomic weapons on Earth and gave up that stock to the U.N.

                They have been few and still are. They are still a mixture of races, nationalities, and religions. They are a free democratic people self selected from that mixture.

                We might mention that while all this was going on they, with the help of a few viking Norsemen, created Russia. Oh, and they had a modern republic type written constitution in 1710.

                I believe that a history of the cultures most effecting these people could be traced back another 4,000 years. However, before about 650 AD they were little recognized in history as a discrete people. Throughout perhaps a thousand years of their history they stayed freer, more democratic, and inclusive than most. They have had to defend themselves and they have. They have also kept the hope and faith that they could live a free people among free people. They have  seen inclusiveness, freedom, and democracy disappear like smoke again and again. Still they hold a vision of that freedom and self governance closer and dearer than do most.

               Please feel free to correct this work or add to it in the "comments" section below or just to click on a social media button just below.

                Ukraine. 

                Thank you for reading.

 

                                                                                    rcs