Noam Chomsky - The Crisis of Democracy

 The name of the the report sounds dishonest to me. Democracy points to our participation in our governance. That is what democracy is, right? We must learn to govern so that we may have income, honor, freedom, dignity, and understanding. and    understanding. This a very young Chomsky!


                                                    rcs



Governance, Dialogue and Dialogue for Governance

 Me


            I have been asked who I am. An honest easy answer is "me." Longer answers which are the truth, the whole and nothing but the truth are more difficult. I'll try a longer answer, but not so long that it might contain outright lies. Let's see, I seem to have become a very old man who's brain is in a bit better shape than his body. I was mostly raised in a tiny desert town in the state of California, USA. I am the one who signs many of these essays "rcs." My full name is Richard Carroll Sheehan. Richard and Carroll are my given names and Sheehan is my surname or last name. Carroll was the family name of my paternal great grandmother. I am an American citizen living in Colombia. I am, in important part the result of my history. Still, it seems to me these days that I wake up each morning a bit different person  than the one who went to sleep the night before.

            As a youngster I was taught that the U.S.A. was a republic which a great many citizens wanted to become increasingly democratic. We were taught that full democracy was governance directly by all the people and that each of those people was a citizen. This full real democracy had never been accomplished, but was a good orienting goal. It was a way to go. We could move toward a democratizing republic. I learned that the American Declaration of Independence strongly suggested that in the new nation the people were to be the citizens; democratically active self-governing citizens; citizens, by right, responsible for governing the nation. That is the ideal to be striven for.

History           
             Still, many of the founders of the country realized that the majority of the prospective citizens had little experience at self-governance. They saw that the new citizens could use some preparation to become self governors. The U.S. Constitution was designed with that in mind as so it was written as a sort of representative democracy. They certainly did not want the country to be a kingdom, theocracy, or anything but a republic with a chance of becoming a growing democracy.

            From my reading of our history I gathered that the idea was the people, the new citizens, of America to become increasingly the more democratic govenors of the republic.
We were choosing to govern ourselves as we wanted in our nation of self made and self chosen laws. So our style of government would be the one we chose, devised, and ran. It was our responsibility and right to govern ourselves.

            Today, at a national level, it seems that most of us have chosen to abdicate the right and responsibility to rule. We have already abdicated many of the rights and responsibilities we had. It seems that many of us have not considered that this may be a slide into powerlessness and uselessness. It also seems that this abdication of active citizenship is not working out well for us.

            We have a lot to learn and a lot to begin practicing.

            Most of us have never become Federalists but we have some history of being democratic republicans.

            I know of the abdicators I have written of above, for I have been one of them. I did not abdicate my active citizenship from conviction but rather most from some laziness and considerable ignorance. I seem to have walked around in a fuzzy have with some deeply buried idea of something like a democratic republic while acting as though voting and being a fairly decent person made me an effective, active, citizen. What a strange dream.

            Now I may be "to soon old and too late smart." I know I now have much less energy than I once had, but I believe that it is not too late to do something. Now I am doing something to claim or reclaim some rights. Those rights seem mostly to be about governing myself as a American citizen together with my fellow citizens, or perhaps together with my brother and sister citizens, or better, my family of citizens.

Our Beliefs

            I believe that our voices matter. I believe that it is important that we be heard. I believe that it is important that we hear each other. I believe that listening and listing to understand is a skill we can practice to our great benefit. I believe that we can effectively claim justice and equality, responsibilities and rights. I strongly believe that our republic and its democracy depends on our daily engagement in governance. I believe that our governance depends on the quality of our discourse. Our thoughts and our communication direct our mutual activities. Our actions, our activities orient our governance. I believe we govern well when we practice our governance together.

            I begin to see our discourse as a form of our "new" dialogue. To get our governance done well I believe that we need to claim time to listen to one another more and probably to do so more regularly. We need to have opportunity to listen to each other's say about our wants and needs, and importantly, about the nature of our governance.


Our Dialogue

            We can claim and reclaim rights to govern ourselves together with fellow citizens. An important right is the right of association an important part of the right of association is the right to talk among ourselves, to listen to each other, to dialogue. Take a look at the Bill of Rights part of our Constitution.

            Our voices matter, our faces to. Our face to face talk can be a great power and great satisfaction. To be a we, our association is vital. It is vital that we be heard and that we hear each other. All topics of our dialogues can be important. That dialogue can be about a traffic light or about justice, equality, public health or anything we want it to be about. Democracy can be a topic of our dialogue. I strongly believe that our depends on our engagement and the quality of our discourse. For many the nature of our democracy and of democracy in general can be an important topic of our talk. 

            I have begun to call our discourse, our group talk, our new dialogue. Our dialogue is important. It helps us to be us and to be we the people. Our thoughts and our communication direct our mutual activities. Our activities, our actions, orient our governance. Our dialogue helps us to practice our governance together.

            To get our governance done well we need to claim the time to listen to one another enough; that includes regularly enough. We need opportunity to have our say about our wants and needs about the nature of our governance, to listen to what others have to say. Including talk about our experience and how it has affected our point of view can be a way to improved understanding and appropriate trust.

            Our dialogue is a great aid to our co-operation and decision making.  Our working together effectively and appropriately can be strongly supported by our ongoing dialogue, our hearing one another, and understanding each other. Our democratic decision making can be well begun with dialogue.

            Certainly our responsibility as citizens is to govern ourselves and that by doing so we can live more pleasantly and abundantly. We can learn from one another and practice our learning together. Our dialogue leads to our resilience.

            Our governance is up to us, its abdicaction is likely to be a step toward uselessness, toward a uselessness which may be worse than slavery.

            The power of determining our governance is ours. Not practicing it is our loss. Practicing our governance is a way to a of life that it is a satisfaction and pleasure to have and hold. Together we can provide ourselves for a greater chance for a civic life of pleasure and satisfaction. You can come see that governance is part of life: family, work, town, state, and more. You to are a part of our life. Voting is not enough. It is not always necessary, but part of voting is finding your way to the nominating process. Together we can do all that is necessary for our governance. Neither you nor I have to do everything, but all of us together have the responsibility for, as a US example, state and county governance. We are responsible for the people in state and county positions. Often we are responsible for their nomination, election and oversite. That is a lot to do; luckily we are very many and we are the bosses and can work out ways to make our effectiveness easy on ourselves. The support of government is up to us. If we do not accept our responsibility will take it up as theirs and they by boss us, dismiss us. or deal with us as they will. It be as my old aunt used to say "Üse it or lose it." 

            We can think of governing ourselves as a major way of taking care of ourselves together. We do not have to take care of ourselves. When we do take care of ourselves we so not have to do it all at once. We can take it up as our orientation and goal. Now is the best time to get started. The longer we wait the more difficult doing so becomes.

            Taking up a responsibility can be work or much like work, but togetherness often brightens one's days.

            Thank you for reading.



                                                                                RCS

350. The Risks of a Deteriorating Democracy feat. Victor Davis Hanson

Victor David Hanson on the workings of democracy. Education to support democracy. What it has meant to be a citizen. What is a citizen? Who is a citizen? Classic education. How has democracy been done. An understanding of democracy is still not overly difficult to find.


Our present system of education does little to support democracy or even describe it.

For a Pleasant and Useful Behavior

We can practice talking among ourselves.



            It seems time to begin speaking to one another about that which is important to us. By us, I mean more than friends, family, political party, or religion, although those dialogues too are very important. I mean, for example, a better cross-section of your town, or city. So, it seems important to learn some new and useful dialogue skills. Our willingness to try and to practice such skills can take us to a better society, to better governance, and to a lot of personal satisfaction.

            I heard on TV recently, a suggestion to be informed, connected, and invested. It got me interested. I thought it seemed a good idea to be well informed, well connected, and well invested in our society. I also thought that it might well take more thought.

            I have also thought that it is good for our well-being to practice freedom, equality, brotherhood, and even goodness. It thought that it would be even better if it were practiced in our daily lives inclusively all over our land. It does seem kind of a good direction to try to go, doesn't it?

            The above suggestions and thoughts seemed could perhaps be more effectively done when they included the practice of participatory governance. Even, if it does not include this and much of the above, some talking together about that which is important to us does seem a very good idea. 

            Fairly early in such talk we need to understand meanings, and to talk them over until we have abundant mutual understanding of what we are talking about. Such talking over must not end. our talk must continue if we are to act together.

            Words are important for the meanings they carry. "Governance" may be easier to understand and taken in than is "democracy" or even "participation." The phrase "participatory democracy" may be newer and more important to understand than one may imagine at first. It is important that we come to a  fuller understanding of each others' understanding or it becomes difficult to act cohesively.

            If  we are to co-operate effectively we need to keep aware of our understandings which are mutual at the present time and those which are not. Doing so necessitates ongoing dialogue on meanings and understanding of phrases such as:
~ Well informed about the nature of our society
~Well connected with others in our society
~ Our citizenship
~ The practice of supporting freedom to and freedom from.
~ The nature of equality in society and in governance.
~ The nature of and importance of brotherhood and goodness in our daily lives
~ The meaning of and the great value of inclusiveness in the maintenance of an effective we and and effective us in our doings.

            These phrases and ones like them have not been used much among us recently. To develop. enough common understanding of them among us may take a lot of talking-over. Many of us already believe that the practice of talking-over is very important now. We are capable of learning to dialogue well enough to become a satisfying and effective us. We are capable of helping our children to develop their dialog power to better effect than we have. 

            Our good talk can guide us to action that leads our humanity to survive and thrive.

            You are more than welcome to comment.

            Thank you for reading.

How to revive your belief in democracy | Eric Liu

Your Belief in Democracy


            How to revive your belief in democracy. Let your democratic values be a bit more like your religion. Share your democratic civic ideals, values, and morals in face to face fellowship. Show up as a citizen. learn more about by the doing of democracy.
                            RCS 

Commitment to One Another and Show up as a Citizen

Your Belief in Democracy


How to revive your belief in democracy | Eric www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqKYtA3pK1c&t=611s


            Show up as a citizen. Share your civic ideals, values , and morals in face to face fellowship. Let your democratic values be a bit like your religion. Learn more about the doing of democracy.

Common Focuses of Governance: It's up to us

 Colombians and others around the world have similar needs and wants some of which they have begun to articulate much like this.


Wants 

            We want a better education and a better quality of life for our children. We know that we need to clarify among ourselves what we understand to be the nature of "better education." We all have ideas of what we mean by "better quality of life," but we have not shared those ideas among ourselves well. We are not sure of how clarify and and share our understandings and ideas among ourselves in ways which allows us to act effectively toward common goals. We know that we have much to learn, but do not have a plan for doing that planning together. We believe that we can define the kind of education we want for our children and for ourselves and know that we have not shared that definition well among ourselves. We believe that we can define the quality of life we want and have not shared well the nature of that life among ourselves. Nor have we shared well our ways of realizing that life.


            We want good health. We want to take better care of our health and we want better health care. We realize that our health can be better cared for with some co-operation, but we have not made adequate arrangements for that cooperation. We realize that there are costs for healthcare and are will to to arrange to pay those costs, but we do not know how mosts of our neighbors are willing to act together with us to satisfy our wants. We imagine that some of our neighbors might want to talk about common wants, but when, where, and how. It seems we have and great deal to learn and more to do together. We have not been doing togetherness very well these days. We are willing to act to the best of our ability, but are finding it difficult to do so.

            We know that we have a lot to learn, but often find that our days are too short to do what needs to be done now without taking on new activities,taking on new activities. Even so,we are willing to consider what is most what is most important to us and that which is most urgent for us to learn. However, we do not know how enough of us can get together to share this doing! We are beginning to realize that learning more of self governance can be a vitalbe a vital step toward gaining and maintaining good governance including an adequate income. It seems that some how, we will need to form a learning group.

            It sometimes seems that our wants exceed our capacity to fulfill them and that seems to true to are needs too! We want justice and co-operation in our lives. We want to practice peace building and maintenance. We could consider together the rights we are willing to claim and and to realize that rights call for responsibilities. But where will we find the energy and the time to do so. We are not even sure of how to get together. We sur can't do everything at once. We are willing to consider how we can develop our quality of life, our personal and common economy, and the improvement of our personal and social well-being. Well, we can't that we don't have anything to do.

Needs            

We are willing to consider what we need from from institutions of higher learning to help us function better as a society, as a people. We need time and space for more togetherness, a time to practice co-operation and to learn from one another. We can't do everything, but we can do something, to take care of our common needs.

            We are willing to better know and to preserve the realities of our history and to focus on its beauties and lessons, but we have unfilled needs. We too often find that we lack enough safety, enough quality food, enough adequate housing, and enough political power. We may lack quality education for our children and have many other lacks. We are beginning to feel ready to practice fulfilling one of those needs together. We are potentially many with a variety of capabilities.We need to talk together about the nature of our cooperation.  How will we arrange to get together?

            We are not willing to be pulled away from the best in our culture and we are not willing to have it wrested from us. We can use our memories of our past to help us deal with with the real happenings, doings, and feelings of today. our feelings of joy, honor, anger, pride, shame, hate, and love are important to us. We do not always have the words to express our wants and needs, but we do want to feel connected to the fonts of our culture.
 
            We are willing to work to be well housed, well fed, and to feel some security. With some comfort and safety we can better enjoy the benefit of realizing our common identity, who we are, and how we belong together.

            We want a full portion of the benefits of togetherness. We can enjoy benefiting from our cooperation in housing ourselves and in teaching our children well. We need some time to take a breath and remember who we have been and who we are. We want as much truth and reality as is comfortable and just a bit more so as to know that we are learning. We are able to feel the feelings, but we want honesty, development, and growth in our lives. We know that there is value in accentuating the positive, and eliminating the negative asa tendency in our lives. We now that lies and and ignorance degrade the quality of our lives.

            We can enjoy learning together, and from one another. We do not have to move forward alone, we can do so together. We know enough about co-operation to make a good start.

            We can find ways of helping one another to do a pretty good job of of taking care of our basic needs. By taking time to talk among ourselves, we can figure out how to do that job and arrange to actually do so.

            Our history and our knowledge of our ancestors can be very useful to us. We can benefit much from the most real stories about that history and the doings of those ancestors. Our memories can help us to tap the power of realistic dreams and imagination.

            Together we can provide ourselves healthier food and learning. Good food for mind and body is very good for us. With well nourished minds and bodies we have the energy and knowledge to care for ourselves together well and to help our children and youth to that same nurishment.

            Together we can learn and practice effective ways to avoid wars, violence, and other dangers to humanity. Avoiding dangers is not  the same as eliminating them. Dangers are always with us, but we are capable of improving are ability to deal with them.

            We can determine to practice valuing, honoring, and respecting one another and to enjoy benefits of doing so.

Listening So As to Better Understand

            We can rediscover that ongoing dialogue is very valuable. Today men, women, and youth are finding that their dialogue leads to the initiation and maintenance of valuable alliances which lead to effective cooperation and the gaining useful aims together. Such togetherness can be lifesaving.

            Well, it seems that there is truly a lot of useful learning we can do. We know that together we can learn better ways to help our children, youth, and ourselves to better learning. We suspect that this better learning is, in large part, listening to understand, especially to those whom we see as different from us.

            We do not seem to be ready to begin practicing collective responsibility yet!
We need to be ready. We may need to strengthen our weness. We may benefit by listening to one another a bit more. To be a we takes more effective communication than ever. Collective responsibility is a bit like co-operation. It may may be a longer lasting lasting , farther reaching, and grander co-operation than is usual, but well within our capability. Can we be we if we cannot decide on one thing, one feature of our society for which we are all collective responsible, can we be we? Any power we can have is in our we-ness. We must have the nature of our responsibility well in mind.

            We can find healthy ways to support/help one another in justice, fairness, and equality. We can do it together. A group of five can be powerful, and we are capable of forming co-operating of 30 or forty. And, one group can co-operate with another group or two. To do so well we need to practice listening to one another well.

            We can come to a common understanding on a much needed want of ours and come to a better understanding of it together and then consider how we can act on it. Maybe we are not able to act on it yet, but maybe we can begin to act or to get ready to act. We can come to consider ways to act together in effective and satisfying ways. We can practice doing so together.

            Together we can come to understand a more useful part of politics. For example for the love of Christ, which includes our love for one another and the right and useful love of stranger and enemy, we can think, speak, and act for a better us. We can call our politics: listening, communicating, understanding, and acting for our common good. Open political discussion can be powerfully good when it is done together, that is democratically with egalitarian space for each and all. Our truth and justice can be our powerful tools.The practice of dialogue skills is useful.

Education

            We can allow effective education and social inclusion to develop among us and we can practice that education and inclusion and enjoy their benefits. We can let the value of non violence be taught as well as ways of self care and protection. We can aim to avoid violence and to consider ways of doing so. We need laws we can all understand and we need to be willing to improve our understanding of them. We need to learn and to teach alternatives to violence and aim to practice those alternatives.

            Teaching, education,and learning can be so attractive, effective, and felt by learners to be so appropriate to them that they are grateful students rather than dropouts. The trick is to make sure that it truly is so important and valuable too.
Part of that appropriate learning is learning to take care of our own health and that of or children as well as to cooperate public health.

            Appropriate adult education can be very useful in helping those engaged in small scale agriculture to produce a good income for themselves and a variety of excellent food for their fellow citizens. But, that help depends on the excellent, appropriate, an ongoing education of their instructors.

            Those instructors are not only needed to help these small scale agriculturalists to deal with the production of their product, but also with its marketing, and more. More may well include aid in co-operating with others in in their business in distribution and sales of their produce. Their successful production and distribution activities helps us all to healthier lives.

Health

            We can use methods of measuring the quality of health among us. We want to do that because our health is important to us. once we know where our health is doing well and where it is not Once we know the pertinent details of that information we can decide how to act on it. We will know who among us is most capable of helping us to make appropriate health decisions and of taking and of taking appropriate health action because we have been cooperating with them on a regular basis.

Production of healthy food

            Small and medium food producers need, want and need and deserve appropriate support. They often benefit by their organizing to provide themselves  that support. Their produce is very important to us so we often rightly choose to cooperate with them to help provide appropriate help. Such support can help them to provide us in a timely manner: needed and wanted fruits and vegetables, and some animal products. With our help producers may find it more economical to provide those where they are wanted, when they are wanted, in appropriate quantities at acceptable prices. With such cooperation it is often possible for producers to gain favorable recompense for their great work.

            Much of the support needed by agriculturists is more of of an informative and practical education than it is any form of monetary subsidy. Our governmental cooperation in securing them access to land, water, and markets is appropriate. Such aids and services are needed in distant rural areas. The development and production in those areas are important to and necessary to each republic. Aid for getting produce to market is particularly important.

            Agricultural associations are especially important for areas at a greater distance from metropolitan centers. Agriculturalists of these areas have needs particular to them. These same same areas are also able to support the needs of the republic in ways other areas are not. One way is to prepare for future needs of a growing republic. Another way is to provide people of the land with a greater variety of foodstuffs. But they also need closer contact with the help universities and governmental offices. Other needs are more dependable transportation for getting their produce to market and more timely information about the needs of the market. 

            Other producers of food are located very close to or actually in metropolitan  areas. Their land and water cost are often high, but their transportation costs are low and they are very close to their markets and can get delicat foods to market quickly and in a fresh state. These small producers can also benefit from the help of universities and government agencies and by prompt information about market needs. They can  benefit greatly from their own organizations.

            Agricultural production aids, in the form of information, education, access to the means of production and marketing on all levels such as county and state levels. Sime of this aid is also deserved by larger agricultural enterprises. Monetary subsidies are seldom needed or deserved.


National Development

            National development of any country still needs attention to food production. We can profit from consideration of our experience with food production. Attention to the effects of governmental action on the quality of food production ought to be included in that consideration. We can also benefit by deciding that we want our consideration to be congenial. Of course we will also decide when and where we shall do our considering. 

             In Colombia as well as in most countries we will come to see that some agrarian reform is an ongoing necessity. That reform may often include the nature of  some distribution and redistribution of land. Climate change is a reason for this, but not the only reason. Such adaptation includes the necessity of some learning and relearning and  ongoing dialogue among concerned and effected parties. The major aim most often is excellent food production and equity of distribution of food and funds. We have finally come to realize that we need to attend more carefully to quality of the food produced.

            The need for such attention is important in the United States, Colombian and most nations and people on Earth. It is time for emphasis to be given given to not only the quality, but also to the variety of food produced. We benefit, for example, from the variety of vegetables, fruit, nuts berries, and herbs available. We can benefit from the varieties of types rabbets, poultry, venison, beef, fish, pork, etc available to us. We can also benefit from some public support for sensible innovation.

            Land availability is an important consideration, as is reparation and redevelopment of poorly used land and new lands is important. Co[operative use of land should have some encouragement.

            Dialogue of what to produce and how to produce agricultural products ought to be wide-spread and ongoing with related widespread education. Related learning opportunities ought to be made available.

Learning

            There is much which needs our consideration, but I am old and life is short. Each of us often feels there are more than enough demandes on us and we feel little need to look for more. Still food is important and sometimes climate change can be brutally rapid and many of us may need to adapt rapidly. Our grandchildren will also feel the need to it. We can help prepare them to make vital life adaptations and and even leave them an Earth a bit easier to adapt to. 

            We can do something to help the the great majority of the population to the learning and understanding they may us to be more adaptable to Earth's realities. We can help provide them with considerations of a humane economy, rights, fair-trade, responsible consumption, self managed finances, growing understandings of nutrition, life, death, and everything.


Communicating

            To survive in good form many more citizens and people in general will need to participate regularly in one or more dialogue  groups. Such groups need to be self informative and educational, but also to participate in social decisions and actions. They ought also be active in the development of organizations dealing with local usages of resources, job creation, employment of youth in important and respected activity, cooperative banks, drinking water and all they see as necessary and possible.

            the dialogue groups I speak of need not to be formalized, incorporated, or granted permission, but only to act within established law. That is they may operate much as did the many clubs and civic organizations which once operated in the US.

            The people of the US, Colombia, and around the world have a possibility of benefiting a lot educationally by participating in citizen groups, clubs, a cooperative, a mutual association, a community organization, a community council ecological clubs, a community action board, or a dialogue group. All such groups have benefited from open participation policies. Nearly everyone and anyone may start such a group or organization.

            We know how to co-operate associative forms of work and play. A cooperative economy can be an integral part of a whole economy. This facilitates the participation and benefits of a growing and developing part of our fellow citizens. Such participation can work to protect a vital part of our citizenry. It could even act to support and stabilize our food production. The  development of wide spread citizen participation makes a stronger, more stable, and more congenial countries.

            We need an ongoing, active, social dialogue to take care of ourselves well.

            Unions and other nonprofit organizations invite us to let go of our dispersion and isolati and act together for our mutual benefits like pleasure, abundance, safety, protection, and development. They also keep us aware of our fundamental rights, of economic and social rights, food autonomy, pure water, and a lot more. So let's practice supporting ourselves together with our daily practices of co-operation, organization, and of developing meaning and understanding in our lives.

            Let's acknowledge that we have much to learn and that we are willing and able to learn together. Get ready.





                                                                            rcs

Begin to Learn More About Citizenship And Governance

By Learning to Search YouTube Well You Can Do Much to Educate Yourself

What  citizens ought to be allowed to know about their own Government.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paGTB2kiyqk

Chomsky On Citizenship

Elon Musk Interviews RFK Jr.

Circle of Power Groups a draft read and rewrite where it seems useful

 An Early Draft

Circle of power groups are far form the only way for citizens to  organize for their wellbeing.


        Citizen assemblies can be another effective way to organize. In such assemblies there is no need to do what an authority or anyone else says we should do. In our assemblies we can learn to trust each other more appropriately. We can listen to one another more carefully and carefully come up with  that which we truly and deeply want in our governance. 
        
            We can also learn to better use that which we have. We can learn to better inspire, inform, and support our elected representatives and others inside of government. It is okay too to act as we decide best to act "inside" our system of governance. Continuing to continue to act in civil society seems also important.
       
             So, the idea is to use our assembly to be better, more effective, active citizens. An perhaps act to act gently and persistently to re- assemble our republic. And we could even allow the more radical among us to consider the true nature of democracy. Still it is well remember that many of us are in this together and that we have a lot to learn and that we do not always speak exactly the same language. So, to learn to act together we need to practice listening to one another carefully.
        
            People who have thought much about citizen assemblies use and interesting word, '''commision.' In dealing with  a working government, even one which is working far from perfectly, we learn that there is a vocabulary they often use which we do not often use and I hope that we seldom do use. We could usefully get ''commissioned" to support and inform parts of government. This is one way to get listened to on the inside. It can be powerfully useful, but it is not necessary. Will want to get powerful people in government to listen to us more carefully and that may be an ongoing goal, but "there is more than one way to skin a cat." Please do not practice on our cats.
       
            Our governance is a public thing and each assembly has the power of being a mini-public.
            
            Our assemblies can become a kind of corporate entities and by so doing gain outside monies from philanthropies and other interested parties to support our ability to do. However, the tendency to do that is the reason why I like our little circles of power to be our principle organization. Still,when has the time and energy it seems fine to be a member of more than one organization. Our very citizenship makes us a member of an organization. My maternal grandmother was a member of about a dozen clubes, her union, and a political party. I found her to a good citizen, a good person, and a good grandmother. I imagine that all her clubs found her to be a member in good standing.

            The special power is produced physically. Goodwill is important. It is well done in a neutral, semi private, and quiet place. It is done by sitting in a circle facing inward. It is best when the chairs are the same or similar. There is no other furniture except perhaps a small table at the center of the circle. Using the circle their may be from 3 to 33 approximately.

            The idea is to give each participant a short period of time to speak at each session for a limited time as the other participants practice listening with care. To learn more about this energizing practice go to the associated site Dialogue With RCS.


Toward Real Democracy

 When we don't use our governance methods we do not have them. We have declared republicanism and democracy as important ways of our governance. Let's begin to consider republicanism and democracy and how they can be used.


This is a quick and sketchy essay at beginning that consideration. So, this piece aims at beginning to clarify our meaning of republicanism and of democracy. Then to consider how they are used and how they are worked to our benefit.

        Participatory democracy is a phrase being used these days. I feel uncomfortable  saying that real democracy is participatory democracy because all democracy must be participatory. That is the word democracy itself means people themselves doing their governance. Once a greater percentage of americans were clear about that. Now in real life there is rarely either this or that, but more often a combination of a lot.

        Republicanism began much as a rejection of the present rule. The rule of the time was rule by monarchy and oligarchy. That was rule by king, nobility, and perhaps a growing merchant class. Than the question was about who should rule. Then as the word republican suggests, the answer was the people. That turned out to be a bit of a problem for those we have called our founding fathers. Perhaps there was a subconscious feeling around that it might be good to be ruled by our fathers. 

        This piece is directed to Americans and is about them doing more of their own governance. However, those of  you who are not U.S. citizens may find something of interest here, perhaps even something useful. Many of the forbearers of present Americans believed that they could take care of themselves together and by doing so could be the governors of themselves. Now numerous present day Americans are beginning to believe that they can revive that belief and forgotten knowledge. It is late for doing that, but I am sure that it is possible.

        When the United States was founded, mostly by Europeans, the concept of a republic had considerable popularity among them. Rule by a king and a hereditary nobility was no longer working well for them/The spread of reading and writing and the actual state of affairs had effected them. A significant portion of educated Europeans knew rather a lot about ancient Greek democratic governance and many thought it was a fine way for a populous to take care of itself.

        A great many of those who began to immigrate to what would become the United States and also to the rest of the Americas were not ready to be ruled to by kings and nobles. They had found that every king had behaved royally and not every noble behaved nobley.

        They got to the new land and found that kings were weak in sway and far away. Many felt that they could take care of themselves and often called that responsibility freedom. The question of how they would do that care taking and freedom, when raised, was seldom well answered. In the back of many minds the thought may have been that someone would take care of that. And they were not wrong. Someone always had, but that someone had not always been careful of everyone. A great many people had little knowledge of many of the factors of self rule and less practice. They had little idea of how to rule themselves together. They did know quite a bit about cooperation in a variety of situations and did have some notion that practice can perfect. 

        A few f them had begun to consider self governance in their present circumstances. They knew about cooperation, and somethings of the workings of the Roman Republic and democracy of ancient Greeks. They knew that few of immigrants had experience with government at state level.

        Naturally the idea of not being ruled by someone else led to the Idea of self rule. The concept of self rule led to some consideration of self-rule together. Thoughts of this sort began to circulate a bit among the general population on both sides of the Atlantic. These thoughts were current among those who would be called the founding fathers of the U.S. Why fathers? Why not patriots or men or just say founders. Is this a hint that many wanted to be taken care of? 

            The idea that rule by others was a problem was a very republican concept and many early Americans. Rule by us became a popular idea, but the nature of who "us" include was, was not always clear. Many said us was all of us, but few included the Chinese in that us at that time. How was this rule was to be done was not clear. It was to be popular rule and we just knew who was popular. I imagine that in early Greece early Greeks were popular. Among early colonial Spanish people it was to gente reason and not every every Spaniard and certainly not some ignorant Frenchman. French said ''us'' was to include every citizen. They knew that a born and bred Turk was not a likely French citizen. For the early greeks democratic rule was not easy, but who was to rule were Greek citizens and the nature of a Greek citizen was agreed on by nearly all Greeks.

        So, this governance deal was not easy to workout. You and I may come pretty close to agreeing who is an American citizen, but just how those should rule you and I or even with you and I could be a problem.

        Among our active ancestors, just before 1776 were some pretty thoughtful guys. Women were not yet consider as strong contenders for citizenship. Anyway some male contenders began to talk things over. Many of them held stronger than usual egalitarian ideas! And their idea of who could be a citizen and man who could speak, read, and write English and not a criminal was certainly a contender. They agreed that not every man who was a citizen was a good person to hold position of power in a new government. Still they thought it best that every citizen be able to participate. So they came to an idea which has been called representative democracy. It is probably not really close to the best idea, but it is still a good one.

            Every citizen could speak for laws, positions, and policies of government and vote for them. Positions in government were to be for limited time and the important and powerful positions were to be held by election by citizens. Good ideas for that time and place. But could every citizen come to any public office and the son or daughter come to any public office? It seems possible.
        
            So, a few men began to consider how to institute such governance in their time and place and the nature of potential citizens. They had the idea of  "representative democracy" in mind. They wanted the will of the people to be well represented. Their reasons for that are important and you can check them out elsewhere or we can review them here later if you so wish. Right now this piece has begun to feel too long for me to manage.

            Back to our theme. States were already being formed so there would be states in this new nation.There could be a senate with men to represent those states. Those men would be elected by the citizens of each state. The people would elect their representatives to express their will and the representatives would write up that will and enact it as the law of the land. A national president would be elected to administer those laws to see that they were followed as the peoples' representatives ordered.

            They began to create a written constitution of this organization of governance. That Constitution was put in effect and today it is still in effect with few modifications. It is still relatively short, but contains many important factors. Among those factors were those put in place to insure that to much power be accumulated in one sector. They wanted national power to be well shared so that the people were well represented and well served.

            Plans worked out pretty well.We had a written constitution which we could use to see how we were doing with our rules in our land. We began to teach our children about republican governance, democracy and our Constitution. Then after a time we began to quickly develop militarily and economically and were pleased, but not very vigilante. Then we began to move into a kind of imperialism which proved to be a poor partner for republicanism. Our population grew quickly, much of that growth was by immigration. 

            As a people we began to forget about our responsibility for taking care of one another politically and for working our Constitution. We began to teach our children, or have them taught, more about making money in certain ways and less about how to govern ourselves together. We mostly had ''good'' ideas for doing what we were doing, but we were losing control of our lives. Our doing did not help us work our republic or us our democracy.Then so of us got so nervous about our republic that we began to call it a democracy and that seemed to lead us to forget the nature of democracy and how to use democracy! I seems that we may be left with a dying Empire if we do not begin to practice appropriate governance. We know that governance has little to do with marching and demonstrating, and not much more with voting. For us it seems to be working the constitution of our republic in a democratic way together.

            We still have an idea that democracy is a good idea, as is republicanism. They are good ideas, but they are unless unless they are worked. They must be used to be useful. They must be used and they ought to be taught. There is much we can do now to take care of ourselves. We can make decisions about taking care of ourselves together. To do that it is best to be among those whom we trust and realize that there are groups worthy of trust. Communication is a key to doing that. Face to face talk is the most powerful communication for us. We can learn to better do that kind of communication. We can communicate with each other and dialogue among ourselves about what we have the will to do together. We can nurture that will in healthy ways.

        In our present government it is now easy to arrange to keep fairly good track of  our own representatives  collective and individual doings and also much of the doings of the rest of our government. We do need some organization as well as some modern technologies. We can learn and act together. There is too much for any one to do alone, but so what? There are enough of us to easily that which needs doing together. We are many. We can cooperate. We already know about co-operation and learn to practice more. Little by little we can learn to appropriately organize our doings. 

           We already have that which we need, take care of the business of taking care of ourselves. We can promptly know what our representatives are doing and to promptly give them instructions as what to do and not to do for us. With the modern technology at our disposal and our appropriate we can easily maintain close communication. Of course representatives will want to know that they are getting our support. They may also know that we are getting close to being able to represent ourselves. Also they know that they have a contract for only a couple of years at a time and may want to get back to their regular job.

            Still, for now, we need to arrange to give our representative abundant and appropriate support along with appropriate oversight. We are getting to know that there so many of us that no one person ever need to feel that they have too much to do. We will find ourselves learning by doing and by practicing our organization; and by becoming more aware of governance in our lives. We will need to practice communication skills and so maintain appropriate trust of fellow citizens. We will probably need to practice our co-operation skills and understanding of the organization close to us. Do not let me discourage you. There is virtually nothing which you really have to do, but much which you can do. Your governance activity is much like being empowered. Also you are the only one who can be you and you are an irreplaceable part of our taking care of ourselves just by being you. Better the best of you than the worst.

            Citizen Assemblies are a  good little example of doing much of what I am writing about. They are a real life demonstration of citizens co-operating to do some of their own governance. Citizen Assemblies are already one movement of effective citizen participation in their own governance. They once in a while seem much like an example of direct democracy. It is evident that these assemblies demonstrate how we can move toward active citizenship and toward the living conditions we desire. We can, as Daniel Stid has written, and I interpret here, bring true citizen perspectives to bear on policy making. We can refine our opinies through informed deliberations and judgements. Deliberations can be a kind of talking together which is much like thinking together.

            These assemblies are demonstrating in a relatively short time ordinary citizens are capable of learning to help their elected representative to help them. Relatively soon they can collectively learn to effectively remind their representatives of citizen needs and encourage them, daily if necessary, to address those needs. They can with some ease and persistence, improve their governance and directly help their representatives to do well. All there is to it is to do it together.

            Ordinary citizens are learning together to help their representatives to do that which they have been elected to do and to see it done or to know the reason why it is not done. Doing it together is the key. They learn to better work their government and we can too. They learn that it is their right and ability to make some changes or additions to the laws of the land. They learn that there are few laws against governance of the people, by the people, and for the people nor in their learning more of good governance and improved citizen activity as they practice their participation in governance of their nation, state, or county.

            Citizen Assemblies have worked out ways to move governments to actions congenial to their citizens. If Public Assemblies and citizen participation interests you or attracts you, you can check out their ways of working.You can check out much online. You can share that which you learn here when the urge strikes you.

            A Citizen Assembly is not the only way for us to work our governance and it is probably not the best way to do so. But, it is an excellent example of a way of doing so. You can find your own way to co-operative governance. Still, right now these Assemblies are worth looking into and learn something of how they work. Citizen Assemblies may be found in your country and online. They can be found in growing numbers in countries calling themselves republics.

            I tend to like co-operating with people who do their best work in clearly inclusive and democratic ways. However, even at my age, I can make some adaptations.

            I believe that this Citizen Assembly idea got started in England, spread to Ireland, then to France and beyond. Mr Stid, and important interpreter of the concept has written that "Ireland has set the pace" in the use of the Assemblies. Not all of the Assemblies are being used at the federal level yet. In the U.S., for example, they have been used at the state level, but mostly in an ad hoc sort of way. I this case I would like to see the organizations have some continuity, but that is not necessary for good work to be done.

            Well, that's about it for me for now. When you find info action related to improved citizen participation in governance, especially cooperative, democratic participation, please feel free to tell us about it. The Assembly way is not the only way. But it does seem that we may have matured enough to govern ourselves, to take care of ourselves together. It does seem time to begin the practice. When you tell me it is OK to publish that which you tell us about doings related to citizen participation we discuss ways of doings. Ways for citizens to democratically co-operate in governance are golden.
    

            Thank you for reading.




                                           Richard Sheehan